|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 10:07:02 AM
|
|
|
Rockwall
Posts: 465
Joined: 8/18/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline
|
Like him or hate him, Bush will be the last pro-life president. Since the most extreme pro-death candidate was voted into office, the days of fighting for the lives of the least among us are over. Sure we can fight for their rights, but since the liberals have the Legislative, Executive, and eventually the Judicial branches of government, resistance is futile.
_____________________________
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 10:16:20 AM
|
|
|
blessedinnyc
Posts: 2002
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
Like him or hate him, Bush will be the last pro-life president. Since the most extreme pro-death candidate was voted into office, the days of fighting for the lives of the least among us are over. Sure we can fight for their rights, but since the liberals have the Legislative, Executive, and eventually the Judicial branches of government, resistance is futile. Hogwash. It just means that Democrats will be able to have more abortions. Nobody's changed anyones' deep-seated views on abortion. Obama won despite his views on abortion, not because of them. As the resident Democrat on this forum, I'll even go so far as to argue that had he been pro-life, I think he would have gotten more votes. You guys will continue running pro-life candidates, and if you offer one that has the right message, he'll win. This will probably happen in eight, maybe twelve years.
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 10:21:21 AM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 7595
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
Hogwash. It just means that Democrats will be able to have more abortions. Nobody's changed anyones' deep-seated views on abortion. Obama won despite his views on abortion, not because of them. As the resident Democrat on this forum, I'll even go so far as to argue that had he been pro-life, I think he would have gotten more votes. You guys will continue running pro-life candidates, and if you offer one that has the right message, he'll win. This will probably happen in eight, maybe twelve years. Actually, this is almost certainly not be true as being a 'pro-life candidate' will now be the equivalent of being a candidate who believes that we should return to the gold standard. Obama is in the unique position to make changing abortion untouchable by future politicians, and he has promised to do so. At that point it simply ceases to be a viable issue in an election.
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 10:24:29 AM
|
|
|
blessedinnyc
Posts: 2002
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jhud Actually, this is almost certainly not be true as being a 'pro-life candidate' will now be the equivalent of being a candidate who believes that we should return to the gold standard. Obama is in the unique position to make changing abortion untouchable by future politicians, and he has promised to do so. At that point it simply ceases to be a viable issue in an election. Hold on. Ron Paul came a lot closer than you think to winning, and he would have returned us to the Gold Standard. Also, abortion is a religious issue, something that the gold standard isn't.
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 10:26:25 AM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 7595
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
Hold on. Ron Paul came a lot closer than you think to winning, and he would have returned us to the Gold Standard. I assume this is a joke? quote:
Also, abortion is a religious issue, something that the gold standard isn't. Even if this were completely true, that makes absolutely no difference.
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 10:46:44 AM
|
|
|
Rockwall
Posts: 465
Joined: 8/18/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc quote:
Like him or hate him, Bush will be the last pro-life president. Since the most extreme pro-death candidate was voted into office, the days of fighting for the lives of the least among us are over. Sure we can fight for their rights, but since the liberals have the Legislative, Executive, and eventually the Judicial branches of government, resistance is futile. Hogwash. It just means that Democrats will be able to have more abortions. Nobody's changed anyones' deep-seated views on abortion. Obama won despite his views on abortion, not because of them. As the resident Democrat on this forum, I'll even go so far as to argue that had he been pro-life, I think he would have gotten more votes. You guys will continue running pro-life candidates, and if you offer one that has the right message, he'll win. This will probably happen in eight, maybe twelve years. You can dismiss it all you want, but Barack's justices will long outlast Barack's term, along with the ability to overturn Roe v. Wade if it goes before the supreme court. You are wrong on being elected despite being pro-death because that is one of the reasons he was elected.
_____________________________
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 10:49:39 AM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 7595
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
You can dismiss it all you want, but Barack's justices will long outlast Barack's term, along with the ability to overturn Roe v. Wade if it goes before the supreme court. You are wrong on being elected despite being pro-death because that is one of the reasons he was elected. It's not really Barak's justices that make the difference here; it's FOCA, which makes the Supreme Court irrelevant in this case.
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 10:56:11 AM
|
|
|
LabGuy
Posts: 3309
Joined: 9/22/2007
From: NW Pennsylvania
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jhud quote:
You can dismiss it all you want, but Barack's justices will long outlast Barack's term, along with the ability to overturn Roe v. Wade if it goes before the supreme court. You are wrong on being elected despite being pro-death because that is one of the reasons he was elected. It's not really Barak's justices that make the difference here; it's FOCA, which makes the Supreme Court irrelevant in this case. We need to be very much in prayer right now. There are still four undecided Senate races. They will determine whether the Democrats have a filibuster-proof supermajority or not. There is still a small hope that FOCA could be filibustered. (Very small given there are pro-choice Republicans. But I guess we'll see how pro-life the supposedly pro-life Democrat Senators really are.) -Robb
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 11:00:48 AM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 7595
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
We need to be very much in prayer right now. There are still four undecided Senate races. They will determine whether the Democrats have a filibuster-proof supermajority or not. There is still a small hope that FOCA could be filibustered. (Very small given there are pro-choice Republicans. But I guess we'll see how pro-life the supposedly pro-life Democrat Senators really are.) That would be an excellent thing to pray for.
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 11:05:25 AM
|
|
|
cow451
Posts: 3952
Joined: 5/6/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: blessedinnyc Hold on. Ron Paul came a lot closer than you think to winning, and he would have returned us to the Gold Standard. You really should warn us when you are being sarcastic.
_____________________________
Nobody ever heard of Acid Rain before we sent people into space.
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 11:22:44 AM
|
|
|
IMA_CHRISTIAN
Posts: 1700
Joined: 1/23/2006
Status: offline
|
how will we know when and if obama will be able to make the dreaded abortion laws come to pass that ya'll are worried about? like, if it does not happen within 2 years, then could we have hope that it might really not happen?
_____________________________
Just give us peace, Lord.
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 11:25:29 AM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 7595
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
how will we know when and if obama will be able to make the dreaded abortion laws come to pass that ya'll are worried about? like, if it does not happen within 2 years, then could we have hope that it might really not happen? Well he promised it would be the first thing he did, and there is nothing stopping him; those are pretty good indicators.
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 11:28:39 AM
|
|
|
LabGuy
Posts: 3309
Joined: 9/22/2007
From: NW Pennsylvania
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jhud quote:
how will we know when and if obama will be able to make the dreaded abortion laws come to pass that ya'll are worried about? like, if it does not happen within 2 years, then could we have hope that it might really not happen? Well he promised it would be the first thing he did, and there is nothing stopping him; those are pretty good indicators. Well he can sign an executive order allowing public funding for abortion, but FOCA has to pass Congress first. We can write our Senators and pray for a filibuster. -Robb
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 11:34:51 AM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 7595
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
Well he can sign an executive order allowing public funding for abortion, but FOCA has to pass Congress first. We can write our Senators and pray for a filibuster. There is always hope in prayer, but I have to say in an effort to be realistic that a filibuster is really only useful when there is a limited time in which to act, and the Dems have nothing but time, and will probably act quickly before the Republicans have a chance to re-group.
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 12:22:55 PM
|
|
|
rlj
Posts: 2350
Joined: 4/14/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
Well he can sign an executive order allowing public funding for abortion, but FOCA has to pass Congress first. We can write our Senators and pray for a filibuster. That would involve some real solid leadership which the GOP Senate hasn't had since the '90s.
_____________________________
-Roger I could wile away the hours Conferrin' with the flowers Consultin' with the rain And my head I'd be scratchin' While my thoughts were busy hatchin' If I only had a brain
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 1:23:50 PM
|
|
|
blue1914
Posts: 360
Joined: 6/21/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Rockwall Like him or hate him, Bush will be the last pro-life president. Since the most extreme pro-death candidate was voted into office, the days of fighting for the lives of the least among us are over. Sure we can fight for their rights, but since the liberals have the Legislative, Executive, and eventually the Judicial branches of government, resistance is futile. I wonder - exactly what do you mean by this? Can you (or anyone) substantively tell me how in a MATERIAL way Mr. Bush has decreased the amount of abortions performed in the United States of America? Can you show me substantively how his policies have caused a greater decrease in abortions that Mr. Clinton of 8 years prior-short answer, no, you can't because it's not true. While abortions decreased under Mr. Bush's leadership, they decreased at a greater rate under Mr. Clinton's leadership. My point is simple-legislation is NOT the answer to the abortion epidemic. On the books of many states in the Union are laws which make the activities of homosexuals illegal-has that stopped homosexual activity (or eventually even gay marriages in other states, etc.)? NO-mainly because those laws are not enforced-how could they be? Instead, the only way we see homosexual activity ending is when we see those who previously were homosexual come to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ. If the church would like to fight abortion, it can do so by: 1. Loving people 2. Caring for people - even those who have children out of wedlock or who have more children than they can take care of - find places FOR those children. 3. Showing true salt and light to the world-offering an alternative to illicit sexual activity by showing a true picture of Jesus Christ to the world. While I am adamantly opposed to abortion, I have YET to see legislation-either for or against it-have a substantive impact on the practice (when it was illegal, people performed it illegally or went to other countries to get it). REAL caring on the other hand is impossible to resist. Wasn't that really the message Jesus gave us in the first place?
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 1:40:22 PM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 7595
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
While I am adamantly opposed to abortion, I have YET to see legislation-either for or against it-have a substantive impact on the practice (when it was illegal, people performed it illegally or went to other countries to get it). REAL caring on the other hand is impossible to resist. Wasn't that really the message Jesus gave us in the first place? First off, there is no indication that there were anywhere near the million-a-year rates of abortion before Roe. There isn't even an indication that there were 10,000 illegal abortions a year before Roe. And there is much good evidence that it was state laws, allowed after Casey, that explains much of the reduction of current abortion rates, along with the defunding of abortion under Bush. Both of which will be reversed under Obama. Not to mention the appointment of two anti-abortion justices under Bush that help build a Supreme Court opposed to abortion. So I would say you are greatly misstating the case.
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 1:51:37 PM
|
|
|
LabGuy
Posts: 3309
Joined: 9/22/2007
From: NW Pennsylvania
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: blue1914 quote:
ORIGINAL: Rockwall Like him or hate him, Bush will be the last pro-life president. Since the most extreme pro-death candidate was voted into office, the days of fighting for the lives of the least among us are over. Sure we can fight for their rights, but since the liberals have the Legislative, Executive, and eventually the Judicial branches of government, resistance is futile. I wonder - exactly what do you mean by this? Can you (or anyone) substantively tell me how in a MATERIAL way Mr. Bush has decreased the amount of abortions performed in the United States of America? Can you show me substantively how his policies have caused a greater decrease in abortions that Mr. Clinton of 8 years prior-short answer, no, you can't because it's not true. While abortions decreased under Mr. Bush's leadership, they decreased at a greater rate under Mr. Clinton's leadership. Off the top of my head (1) Stopped public funding of abortions and (2) Signed the partial-birth abortion ban into law. I'm sure there's more. quote:
My point is simple-legislation is NOT the answer to the abortion epidemic. On the books of many states in the Union are laws which make the activities of homosexuals illegal-has that stopped homosexual activity (or eventually even gay marriages in other states, etc.)? NO-mainly because those laws are not enforced-how could they be? Instead, the only way we see homosexual activity ending is when we see those who previously were homosexual come to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ. The Supreme Court ruled such laws unconstitutional in the Lawrence v. Texas case. That might have something to do with it. quote:
While I am adamantly opposed to abortion, I have YET to see legislation-either for or against it-have a substantive impact on the practice (when it was illegal, people performed it illegally or went to other countries to get it). REAL caring on the other hand is impossible to resist. Wasn't that really the message Jesus gave us in the first place? Stats on abortion before Roe are difficult to come by (since it was, of course, illegal), but in the first year after, 744,600 legal abortions were performed. We're at nearly double that number now with only a roughly 50% increase in population. Further, various statistics provided by abortion proponents have been shown to be complete fabrications. Such as the claim that 5,000-10,000 women died from illegal abortions each year before Roe. The actual number is around 100. -Robb
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 2:44:26 PM
|
|
|
Rockwall
Posts: 465
Joined: 8/18/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: blue1914 I wonder - exactly what do you mean by this? Can you (or anyone) substantively tell me how in a MATERIAL way Mr. Bush has decreased the amount of abortions performed in the United States of America? Can you show me substantively how his policies have caused a greater decrease in abortions that Mr. Clinton of 8 years prior-short answer, no, you can't because it's not true. While abortions decreased under Mr. Bush's leadership, they decreased at a greater rate under Mr. Clinton's leadership. The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act was enacted August 5, 2002, and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act was enacted November 5, 2003. Can you unequivocally prove that those Acts did not save human beings? quote:
My point is simple-legislation is NOT the answer to the abortion epidemic. On the books of many states in the Union are laws which make the activities of homosexuals illegal-has that stopped homosexual activity (or eventually even gay marriages in other states, etc.)? NO-mainly because those laws are not enforced-how could they be? Instead, the only way we see homosexual activity ending is when we see those who previously were homosexual come to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ. Flawed logic. There are laws against pedophilia but that abhorrent behavior continues. Has the laws against pedophilia stopped perverts from doing what they do? If those laws don't work, should we then remove these laws? quote:
If the church would like to fight abortion, it can do so by: 1. Loving people 2. Caring for people - even those who have children out of wedlock or who have more children than they can take care of - find places FOR those children. 3. Showing true salt and light to the world-offering an alternative to illicit sexual activity by showing a true picture of Jesus Christ to the world. While I am adamantly opposed to abortion, I have YET to see legislation-either for or against it-have a substantive impact on the practice (when it was illegal, people performed it illegally or went to other countries to get it). REAL caring on the other hand is impossible to resist. The church can try to fight abortion all it wants, but as long as man's law allows it, there will be abortions. quote:
Wasn't that really the message Jesus gave us in the first place? Show me where Jesus said that we should play God and kill babies. Show me that passage and I will donate $50 to the church of your choosing and will post the Paypal receipt.
_____________________________
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 3:24:49 PM
|
|
|
IMA_CHRISTIAN
Posts: 1700
Joined: 1/23/2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Rockwall [Show me where Jesus said that we should play God and kill babies. Show me that passage and I will donate $50 to the church of your choosing and will post the Paypal receipt. I know,, I know!!! God ordered King Saul to kill all the Amelikites, everything, animals, people, and of course there were babies. I will take that $50 check! Actually you may send it to Heart Cry Missionary Society, a very excellent missionary society, headed by Paul Washer, who trains indiginous natives to preach the gospel in their own lands.
_____________________________
Just give us peace, Lord.
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 4:40:20 PM
|
|
|
SovereignIsHe
Posts: 5935
Joined: 4/15/2005
From: Northern Califonria
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: blue1914 they decreased at a greater rate under Mr. Clinton's leadership. Leadership? What leadership are you referring to? quote:
My point is simple-legislation is NOT the answer to the abortion epidemic. Of course not, it's part of the answer... quote:
On the books of many states in the Union are laws which make the activities of homosexuals illegal-has that stopped homosexual activity (or eventually even gay marriages in other states, etc.)? What law stops any crime? This is the weakest and yet most posted argument.... quote:
NO-mainly because those laws are not enforced-how could they be? Instead, the only way we see homosexual activity ending is when we see those who previously were homosexual come to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ. Since most evil things are not done out in the sight of everyone what does the enforcement issue really have to do with it? quote:
If the church would like to fight abortion, it can do so by: 1. Loving people People are having abortion because the church is loving people? quote:
2. Caring for people - even those who have children out of wedlock or who have more children than they can take care of - find places FOR those children. Or else? quote:
3. Showing true salt and light to the world-offering an alternative to illicit sexual activity by showing a true picture of Jesus Christ to the world. Can't do that since that would be saying people are wrong... quote:
While I am adamantly opposed to abortion, I have YET to see legislation-either for or against it-have a substantive impact on the practice (when it was illegal, people performed it illegally or went to other countries to get it). When it was illegal there were not 3000 unborn children murdered daily... And people getting it done illegally and out out of the country is not because the law is wrong, it's because of what they doing is wrong... quote:
REAL caring on the other hand is impossible to resist. Problem is not enough people REALly care about the unborn child... quote:
Wasn't that really the message Jesus gave us in the first place? One of the clear messages He gave was... "Go and sin no more..." Which would have people on this very forum calling Him a hater....
_____________________________
John Proverbs 12:10 A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel.
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 10:02:09 PM
|
|
|
RichLP
Posts: 1511
Joined: 5/4/2005
Status: offline
|
The support given to George W. Bush on grounds he is "pro-life" and the criticisms towards Barack Obama on grounds he is "pro-death" are quite odd considering that Bush's war on Iraq led to 4000+ dead American servicepersons, dozens of thousands of injured/wounded (3rd degree burns, maimed, paraplegic, brain damaged, blinded, etc), not to mention hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis and injured/maimed/crippled Iraqis, the emotional pain of dead relatives, the suffering from no food, fleeing homes, the shattered lives, disease (cholera breakouts in Iraq even as I type), 4 million refugees... Bush, pro-life. Indeed.
_____________________________
"We have removed an ally of Al Qaeda" - G.W. Bush lies to America and to the world, 5/1/2003
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 10:59:59 PM
|
|
|
Jhud
Posts: 7595
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Lake Wobegon
Status: offline
|
quote:
The support given to George W. Bush on grounds he is "pro-life" and the criticisms towards Barack Obama on grounds he is "pro-death" are quite odd considering that Bush's war on Iraq led to 4000+ dead American servicepersons, dozens of thousands of injured/wounded (3rd degree burns, maimed, paraplegic, brain damaged, blinded, etc), not to mention hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis and injured/maimed/crippled Iraqis, the emotional pain of dead relatives, the suffering from no food, fleeing homes, the shattered lives, disease (cholera breakouts in Iraq even as I type), 4 million refugees... Bush, pro-life. Indeed. I know it's hard to comprehend, because you are myopically conditioned to seeing every issue through the 'Bush is evil because of Iraq' lens, but take the total number of service people who died in Iraq, who joined the military fully aware of the risks, and multiply that number times the number of days between today and Jan. 22nd, 1973. That difference between those two numbers will tell you the difference between a pro-life and pro-choice President.
_____________________________
Jack I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 11:09:27 PM
|
|
|
Rockwall
Posts: 465
Joined: 8/18/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RichLP The support given to George W. Bush on grounds he is "pro-life" and the criticisms towards Barack Obama on grounds he is "pro-death" are quite odd considering that Bush's war on Iraq led to 4000+ dead American servicepersons, dozens of thousands of injured/wounded (3rd degree burns, maimed, paraplegic, brain damaged, blinded, etc), not to mention hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis and injured/maimed/crippled Iraqis, the emotional pain of dead relatives, the suffering from no food, fleeing homes, the shattered lives, disease (cholera breakouts in Iraq even as I type), 4 million refugees... Bush, pro-life. Indeed. It is quite odd that you compare those who have died in a war to the murder of millions of helpless babies who have never harmed anybody. More babies have been killed in America Alone in the last 4 years than Americans killed in all the wars combined: quote:
War of Independence (1775-1783) 25,000 Quasi-War (1798-1800) 20 Barbary Wars (1801-1815) 35 War of 1812 (1812-1815) 20,000 1st Seminole War (1817-1818) 30 2nd Seminole War (1835-1842) 1,500 Mexican-American War (1846-1848) 13,283 3rd Seminole War (1855-1858) 26 Civil War (1861-1865) 623,026 Indian Wars (1865-1898) 919 Spanish-American War (1898) 2,446 Phillipine War (1898-1902) 4,196 Boxer Rebellion (1900-1901) 37 Mexican Revolution (1914-1919) 35 Haiti Occupation (1915-1934) 146 World War 1 (1917-1918) 116,708 World War 2 (1941-1945) 407,316 Korean War (1950-1953) 36,914 Vietnam War (1964-1973) 58,169 El Salvador (1980-1992) 20 Beirut (1982-1984) 266 Persian Gulf Support (1987-1988) 39 Invasion of Grenada (1983) 19 Invasion of Panama (1989) 40 Gulf War (1991) 269 Somalia (1992-1993) 43 Bosnia 1995 12 Afghanistan (2002-2008) 609 Iraqi (2003-2008) 4,177 Source LINK Sure, praise Barack: quote:
Jeremiah 1:5 "Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb, I sanctified thee..." Luke 1:15 "He shall be filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his mother's womb"
_____________________________
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely
|
|
|
|
RE: Bush, the last pro-life president - 11/5/2008 11:11:29 PM
|
|
|
henny
Posts: 1167
Joined: 4/15/2005
From: MN
Status: offline
|
I don't think abortion has ever been a major issue, or at least not for the past 20 years or so. There's a portion of people who feel strongly about it on either side of the debate, but the vast majority of people will not consider it at all in choosing a candidate. This was as true under Bush as it is under Obama. Bush didn't win because he's pro-life anymore than Obama won because he's pro-choice. Their pro-life/choice stances certainly influenced groups of people to vote for them either way, but it was never the deciding factor. So, yes there will be viable pro-life candidates in the future. This isn't necessarily because the vast majority of people will be pro-life, however, as much as it is because I don't think that it is a make or break issue for most people when deciding who to vote for.
_____________________________
Hell is other Christians.
|
|
|
|
|