|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
[Deleted] - 9/10/2008 9:57:01 AM
|
|
|
Deleted User
|
[Deleted by Admins]
|
|
|
|
[Deleted] - 9/10/2008 10:03:32 AM
|
|
|
Deleted User
|
[Deleted by Admins]
|
|
|
|
RE: mclaren and 'eternal life' - 9/10/2008 10:07:47 AM
|
|
|
JimboFletch
Posts: 6614
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
You are precious, Socrates. You whine when I won't follow your script by answering your questions intended to trap and steer the discussion your way (I recall that also being used ineffectively by the Saducees). Then you whine and posture when I ask you to answer your own question. It makes me wonder if I caught you off guard with the implications of your brilliant question. I certainly don't have a problem with a balanced and biblically sound interpretation of my Savior's teachings on any subject. (Take a peek at 2 Peter 1:20) Let me use the mature words of another believer who criticized folk for putting up with nonesense: For you, being so wise, tolerate the foolish gladly. For you tolerate it if anyone enslaves you, anyone devours you, anyone takes advantage of you, anyone exalts himself, anyone hits you in the face. That's classic Pauline sarcasm that you seem to consider so immature in others.
|
|
|
|
RE: mclaren and 'eternal life' - 9/10/2008 10:12:34 AM
|
|
|
JimboFletch
Posts: 6614
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: emerging Again: What does Jesus mean when he says those who live by the sword will die by the sword? Respectfully as I know how: Did Jesus literally mean that each and every soldier that uses a sword in carrying out his duty and each and every government official that carries out executions will be killed by the instrument they use? Or, perhaps, was it intended to convey that a mean-spirited, violent, and evil man can expect to reap the same sort of violent end they cause others?
|
|
|
|
[Deleted] - 9/10/2008 10:18:45 AM
|
|
|
Deleted User
|
[Deleted by Admins]
|
|
|
|
RE: mclaren and 'eternal life' - 9/10/2008 10:40:35 AM
|
|
|
jazzact13
Posts: 485
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
As Christians, are you committed to violence? Yes or no? I will answer it. No, I'm not. Why? Because I do not see such a commitment being asked for by Jesus or anyone else in the New Testament. Was Jesus commited to non-violence when he made a whip and drove the moneychangers from the temple? Was He commited to non-violence when told the disciples to start taking swords with them? And if I may say, by you saying that you would defend your wife if she is attacked, your commitment to non-violence is rather questionable, too. quote:
What does Jesus mean by : Those who live by the sword shall die by the sword? Exactly what he said. Upon what basis do you think He is saying the sword shouldn't be used, especially considering that He had shortly before told his disciples to start taking swords with them?
_____________________________
there is no justice in the rhetoric of class hatred
|
|
|
|
[Deleted] - 9/10/2008 10:46:46 AM
|
|
|
Deleted User
|
[Deleted by Admins]
|
|
|
|
RE: mclaren and 'eternal life' - 9/10/2008 10:46:47 AM
|
|
|
JimboFletch
Posts: 6614
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: emerging Now was that so hard? You almost sound like a person engaged in a conversation. But you are only half way there. Answering a question with another question is not an answer. But I will answer you: The answer to both your questions is NO. So once again, what do you think he meant? Thanks. It intended to convey that mean-spirited, violent, and evil men can expect to reap the same sort of violent end they cause others. Violence should never be a first, but always a last resort. Even Jesus' statement regarding turning the other cheek is not total exclusion of violence. As someone else noted earlier, His teachings were intended to make us seek the least harm to our dealings with others. But He never eliminated a direct, deadly defense.
|
|
|
|
RE: mclaren and 'eternal life' - 9/10/2008 10:48:16 AM
|
|
|
jazzact13
Posts: 485
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
Your problem seems to be with Jesus' words, not mine. And you have diagnosed the situation incorrectly. quote:
As far as your emotional and false projections upon me, be careful. You don't know enough about me to even make such claims. I am drawing reasonable conclusions from your own words. You claim to have been in the military at one time, yet here you are telling us that you think all wars are wrong. Ergo, you must view your own time military as having been a time you were wrong, in order to be consistent with your current beliefs. quote:
To be committed to nonviolence is not to spit on the graves of those who have died to give us the freedoms we enjoy as Americans, jazz. So, you are telling us that people (soldiers) can commit sin (fighting) and you are going to honor them for doing it?
_____________________________
there is no justice in the rhetoric of class hatred
|
|
|
|
RE: mclaren and 'eternal life' - 9/10/2008 10:52:51 AM
|
|
|
jazzact13
Posts: 485
Joined: 4/15/2005
Status: offline
|
A bit of something to think on, from Chesterton's Orthodoxy. quote:
So it is also, of course, with the contradictory charges of the anti-Christians about submission and slaughter. It IS true that the Church told some men to fight and others not to fight; and it IS true that those who fought were like thunderbolts and those who did not fight were like statues. All this simply means that the Church preferred to use its Supermen and to use its Tolstoyans. There must be SOME good in the life of battle, for so many good men have enjoyed being soldiers. There must be SOME good in the idea of non-resistance, for so many good men seem to enjoy being Quakers. All that the Church did (so far as that goes) was to prevent either of these good things from ousting the other. They existed side by side. The Tolstoyans, having all the scruples of monks, simply became monks. The Quakers became a club instead of becoming a sect. Monks said all that Tolstoy says; they poured out lucid lamentations about the cruelty of battles and the vanity of revenge. But the Tolstoyans are not quite right enough to run the whole world; and in the ages of faith they were not allowed to run it. The world did not lose the last charge of Sir James Douglas or the banner of Joan the Maid. And sometimes this pure gentleness and this pure fierceness met and justified their juncture; the paradox of all the prophets was fulfilled, and, in the soul of St. Louis, the lion lay down with the lamb. But remember that this text is too lightly interpreted. It is constantly assured, especially in our Tolstoyan tendencies, that when the lion lies down with the lamb the lion becomes lamb-like. But that is brutal annexation and imperialism on the part of the lamb. That is simply the lamb absorbing the lion instead of the lion eating the lamb. The real problem is--Can the lion lie down with the lamb and still retain his royal ferocity? THAT is the problem the Church attempted; THAT is the miracle she achieved.
_____________________________
there is no justice in the rhetoric of class hatred
|
|
|
|
[Deleted] - 9/10/2008 10:54:22 AM
|
|
|
Deleted User
|
[Deleted by Admins]
|
|
|
|
[Deleted] - 9/10/2008 11:01:57 AM
|
|
|
Deleted User
|
[Deleted by Admins]
|
|
|
|
[Deleted] - 9/10/2008 12:24:03 PM
|
|
|
Deleted User
|
[Deleted by Admins]
|
|
|
|
[Deleted] - 9/10/2008 12:31:01 PM
|
|
|
Deleted User
|
[Deleted by Admins]
|
|
|
|
RE: mclaren and 'eternal life' - 9/10/2008 12:44:34 PM
|
|
|
JimboFletch
Posts: 6614
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: emerging Jesus' companion isn't said to be "evil" or "mean-spirited" or "violent" but one who is protecting what is "right" (Jesus) and acting out violently against that which is unjust and violent (Rome). Luke tells us that the one that drew the sword was the quick tempered, unthinking Peter who reacted with his gut instead of his head. I seriously doubt that he considered his actions in the least. But, as I noted, used the sword or violence as his first, not last resort. Jesus was trying o teach the slow-to-learn Peter something about thinking before acting. He also was showing him, yet again, that when Jesus is in charge, He is the one to be followed.
|
|
|
|
[Deleted] - 9/10/2008 12:46:27 PM
|
|
|
Deleted User
|
[Deleted by Admins]
|
|
|
|
RE: mclaren and 'eternal life' - 9/10/2008 12:49:40 PM
|
|
|
colliefan
Posts: 2789
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: Raleigh, NC
Status: offline
|
quote:
wrong. He used a whip on the animals to drive them out. In effect, he saved their lives from a broken sacrificial system! verse please. and how was the sacriifical system broken but a foreshadowing of Christ's sacrifice. that is, unless you assume that His death wasn't a propitiation for our sins? Your comment about Jesus using a whip to drive out the animals is in error acording to scripture. quote:
John 2:13 - 16 (HCSB) 13The Jewish £Passover£ was near, so Jesus went up to Jerusalem.£ 14In the £temple complex£ He found people selling oxen, sheep, and doves, and ëHe also foundû the money changers sitting there. 15After making a whip out of cords,£ He drove everyone out of the temple complex with their sheep£ and oxen. He also poured out the money changers’ coins and overturned the tables. 16He told those who were selling doves, “Get these things out of here! Stop turning My Father’s£ house£ into a marketplace!”£ £ Jesus knew that war is a result of the fallen human condition. Nowhere in scipture did he condem war between nations. quote:
Matt 24:4 - 8 (HCSB) 4Then Jesus replied to them: “Watch out that no one deceives£ you. 5For many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am the £Messiah,’ and they will deceive many.£ 6You are going to hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not alarmed, because these things must take place, but the end is not yet. 7For nation will rise up against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines£ £ and earthquakes in various places.£ 8All these events are the beginning of birth pains.£ Much of the liberal church has embraced a "woman's right to choose." Why haven't the pacifists come about against abortion?
|
|
|
|
RE: mclaren and 'eternal life' - 9/10/2008 12:56:08 PM
|
|
|
Ps103
Posts: 11695
Joined: 4/16/2005
From: Here, now
Status: offline
|
MODERATOR'S NOTE :: ATTENTION PLEASE This thread is closed. You may discuss the topic HERE. Please read TOS 5, 6 and 9 before participating. Thank you. Please do not reply to this message within the Community. Please email Community@salemwebnetwork.com with questions, comments, or concerns. Please do not send me PMs regarding this message.
_____________________________
Fasten your seatbelts...it's going to be a bumpy night.
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|