Preaching.com Forums on Faith Community Network
  Forum Tools
Ministry Leaders Folder

Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 
  Sponsor

RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Christian values?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Christian values?
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Chris... - 10/23/2008 12:57:24 PM   
Market42Fan

 

Posts: 240
Joined: 9/10/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JJB1222

If Christ were to cast a ballot, how would he vote?

Huntley Brown, a concert pianist and man of God, says it best...


Why I Can't Vote For Obama
By Huntley Brown

Dear Friends,

A few months ago I was asked for my perspective on Obama. I sent out an e-mail with a few points. With the election just around the corner, I decided to complete my perspective. Those of you on my e-list have seen some of this before, but it's worth repeating...

First, I must say whoever wins the election will have my prayer support. Obama needs to be commended for his accomplishments--but I need to explain why I will not be voting for him.

Many of my friends process their identity through their blackness. I process my identity through Christ. Being a Christian (a Christ follower) means He leads. I follow. I can't dictate the terms. He does because He is the leader.

I can't vote black because I am black; I have to vote Christian because that's who I am. Christian first, black second. Neither should anyone from the other ethnic groups vote because of ethnicity. 200 years from now, I won't be asked if I was black or white. I will be asked if I knew Jesus and accepted Him as Lord and Savior.

In an election, there are many issues to consider. But when a society gets abortion, same-sex marriage, embryonic stem-cell research, human cloning--to name a few--wrong economic concerns will soon not matter.

We need to follow Martin Luther King's words. Don't judge someone by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. I don't know Obama, so all I can go off of is his voting record. His voting record earned him the title of the most liberal senator in the US Senate in 2007.

NATIONAL JOURNAL: Obama: Most Liberal Senator in 2007 (01/31/2008)

To beat Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton as the most liberal senator, takes some doing. Obama accomplished this feat in two short years. I wonder what would happen to America if he had four years to work with.

There is a reason Planned Parenthood gives him a 100% rating. There is a reason the homosexual community supports him. There is a reason Ahmadinejad, Chavez, Castro, Hamas, etc. love him. There is a reason he said he would nominate liberal judges to the Supreme Court. There is a reason he voted against the infanticide bill. There is a reason he voted No on the constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. There is a reason he voted No on banning partial birth abortion. There is a reason he voted No on confirming Justices Roberts and Alito. These two judges are conservatives, and they have since overturned partial birth abortion--the same practice Obama wanted to continue.
There is a reason Obama opposed the parental notification law.

Think about this: You can't give a kid an aspirin without parental notification but that same kid can have an abortion without parental notification. This is insane.

There is a reason he went to Jeremiah Wright's church for 20 years.

Obama tells us he has good judgment, but he sat under Jeremiah Wright's teaching for 20 years. Now he is condemning Wright's sermons. I wonder why now?

Obama said Jeremiah Wright led him to the Lord and discipled him. A disciple is one in training. Jesus told us in Matthew 28:19-20 "Go and make disciples of all nations." This means reproduce yourself. Teach people to think like you, walk like you, talk like you, believe what you believe, etc. The question I have is: What did Jeremiah Wright teach him?

Would you support a White President who went to a church which has tenets that said they have a ...

1. Commitment to the White Community
2. Commitment to the White Family
3. Adherence to the White Work Ethic
4. Pledge to make the fruits of all developing and acquired skills available to the White Community.
5. Pledge to Allocate Regularly a Portion of Personal Resources for Strengthening and Supporting White Institutions
6. Pledge allegiance to all White leadership who espouse and embrace the White Value System
7. Personal commitment to embracement of the White Value System.

Would you support a President who went to a church like that?

Just change the word from white to black and you have the tenets of Obama's former church. If President Bush were a member of a church like this, he would be called a racist. Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton would have been marching outside.

This kind of church is a racist church. Obama did not wake up after 20 years and just discover he went to a racist church. The church can't be about race. Jesus did not come for any particular race. He came for the whole world.

A church can't have a value system based on race. The church's value system has to be based on biblical mandate. It does not matter if it's a white church or a black church, it's still wrong. Anyone from either race that attends a church like this would never get my vote.

Obama's former Pastor Jeremiah Wright is a disciple of liberal theologian James Cone, author of the 1970 book A Black Theology of Liberation. Cone once wrote: "Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then He is a murderer, and we had better kill Him."

Cone is the man Obama's mentor looks up to. Does Obama believe this?

So what does all this mean for the nation?

In the past, when the Lord brought someone with the beliefs of Obama to lead a nation it meant one thing--judgment.

Read 1 Samuel 8 when Israel asked for a king. First God says in 1 Samuel 1:9 "Now listen to them; but warn them solemnly and let them know what the king who will reign over them will do."

Then God says in 1 Samuel 8:18 " When that day comes, you will cry out for relief from the king you have chosen, and the LORD will not answer you in that day." 19 But the people refused to listen to Samuel. "No!" they said. "We want a king over us. 20 Then we will be like all the other nations, with a king to lead us and to go out before us and fight our battles." 21 When Samuel heard all that the people said, he repeated it before the LORD. 22 The LORD answered, "Listen to them and give them a king."

Here is what we know for sure.

God is not schizophrenic.

He would not tell one person to vote for Obama and one to vote for McCain. As the scripture says, a city divided against itself cannot stand, so obviously many people are not hearing from God.

Maybe I am the one not hearing--but I know God does not change and Obama contradicts many things I read in scripture, so I doubt it.

For all my friends who are voting for Obama, can you really look God in the face and say: Father, based on your word, I am voting for Obama--even though I know he will continue the genocidal practice of partial birth abortion. He might have to nominate three or four Supreme Court justices, and I am sure he will be nominating liberal judges who will be making laws that are against You. I also know he will continue to push for homosexual rights--even though you destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for this. I know I can look the other way because of the economy.

I could not see Jesus agreeing with many of Obama's positions. Finally, I have two questions for all my liberal friends.

Since we know someone's value system has to be placed on the nation,

1. Whose value system should be placed on the nation?

2. Who should determine that this is the right value system for the nation?

Blessings,

Huntley Brown



I couldn't put it any better myself.

P.S.: Is it just me or has anyone else noticed that the Democrat nominee has been the most liberal person in the Senate the last two Presidential elections (Obama this year, John Kerry in '04)?
Post #: 26
RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Chris... - 10/23/2008 1:09:00 PM   
Psalms274


Posts: 2243
Joined: 8/13/2005
From: Georgia
Status: offline
Thank you for the letter ... he did indeed say it very well.

Christ will always come before what I perceive will happen to my pocketbook. The neat thing about following Christ is He will always take care of you as you follow.

_____________________________

I pray that you, being rooted and established in love, may have power, together with all the saints, to grasp how wide and long and high and deep is the love of Christ.

Linus, my dog, little Kaleigh and Sally!

http://piswa.blogspot.com/
Post #: 27
RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Chris... - 10/23/2008 1:38:16 PM   
relady

 

Posts: 1212
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Greater St. Louis Metro
Status: offline
quote:

John McCain will appoint justices like Alito and Roberts, and Alito has already stated that Roe v. Wade should be revisited
Which, after 35 years and much supporting case law would be in and of itself "activist" rather than "constructionist." Repubs and prolifers are all for activist court decisions when it's something THEY support.
Post #: 28
RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Chris... - 10/23/2008 1:42:14 PM   
Lapidoth

 

Posts: 3467
Joined: 4/13/2005
From: OKLAHOMA
Status: offline
I just sent that letter out to my email listings.

_____________________________

Why does He keep quoting Torah? Doesn't He know He's about to abolish it?
http://www.tedpearce.com/Videos/TheForgottenpeople.html
BARUCH HABA BASHEM YAHUAH
Post #: 29
RE: Voting and Christian Values - 10/23/2008 4:01:26 PM   
SovereignIsHe


Posts: 5921
Joined: 4/15/2005
From: Northern Califonria
Status: offline
quote:


ORIGINAL: Evangel70

IF Jesus taught us to look to the government to change the hearts of men regarding issues like abortion and gay rights, we would have a different choice of candidates.


The government is ordained to be God's minister of wrath for those who do evil... How is a Christian not to look to the government to uphold its ordained purpose?

_____________________________

John
Proverbs 12:10 A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel.
Post #: 30
RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Chris... - 10/23/2008 4:16:19 PM   
SuspenseWriter


Posts: 470
Joined: 2/22/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: relady

quote:

John McCain will appoint justices like Alito and Roberts, and Alito has already stated that Roe v. Wade should be revisited
Which, after 35 years and much supporting case law would be in and of itself "activist" rather than "constructionist." Repubs and prolifers are all for activist court decisions when it's something THEY support.


And the abortion lovers MUST fight such appointees with every bit of zeal they can. We get it.

_____________________________

John Robinson
writer of suspense...obviously!
www.johnrobinsonbooks.com
http://www.johnrobinsonbooks.com/my-journal/
Post #: 31
RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Chris... - 10/23/2008 4:19:50 PM   
LabGuy


Posts: 3306
Joined: 9/22/2007
From: NW Pennsylvania
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: relady

quote:

John McCain will appoint justices like Alito and Roberts, and Alito has already stated that Roe v. Wade should be revisited
Which, after 35 years and much supporting case law would be in and of itself "activist" rather than "constructionist." Repubs and prolifers are all for activist court decisions when it's something THEY support.


There is no "right" to abortion in the Constitution. If it is abolished, it will be because the justices go back, look at the text and rule according to the intended meaning of it. Not what they want it to mean. That is not activism. That is sound jurisprudence. Something being around for 35 years does not make it right. How long was slavery around? How many court decisions supported it?

The Fifth Amendment guarantees that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. The unborn being murdered are being denied that protection. A straightforward reading of the text tells you it is a crime. We desperately need judges who will rule it so and not make up justifications out of whole cloth.

-Robb
Post #: 32
RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Chris... - 10/23/2008 5:03:02 PM   
ta_mosquito


Posts: 11449
Joined: 3/31/2005
From: from MN, now in Ontario :D
Status: offline
MODERATOR'S NOTE :: ATTENTION PLEASE

Posting entire articles is against our Terms of Service. Therefore your post has been edited. You may post a small portion of an article, then provide the link to the entire passage.

If you receive the article via email and cannot find a web link for it, then you cannot post it as it's still a copyright violation.

Please email community@salemwebnetwork.com with questions, comments or concerns.

Please do not respond to this message within the Community, or via PM as I am not authorized to discuss it further.


Thank you!

Tricia
Forums Moderator
Post #: 33
RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Chris... - 10/23/2008 11:38:24 PM   
ljmac

 

Posts: 1320
Joined: 11/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: P31W

quote:

abortion is a non-issue in this election anyway


Abortion may be a "non issue" for you in this election that however does not mean you are correct. If Obama wins he is going to strip states rights away. Meaning in our state parents will no longer be required to give concent for their 16 yr old daughter to have an abortion. Manditory counseling and the following 24 hour waiting period will be done away with. The medical requirement that our state has in place will be swept away.

Also taking into account that with an Obama administration public tax dollars will be used to promote and preform abortion is it going to be an issue all tax payers should be concerned about.


You cannot serve both God and Money.


Liz has her stories and they never change, good economy, bad economy, she'll always find an excuse to support those who make it easy to kill children.

She spreads this nonsense that electing Obama will be no different than McCain concerning abortion. The truth is that electing BHO will be a death sentence for many children.

Obama has said that he will fight the Hyde amendment. The Hyde (R-IL) amendment prevents the fed gov. from paying for abortions. Liberal Nat Hentoff has estimated that it has saved one million lives.

Obama has also said that he will send money to foreign agencies that abort children. If you're a brown or black baby your chances of survival are in peril.

These are not all. He has other plans to insure the destruction of innocent lives, such as signing the Freedom of Choice Act and promoting pro-abortion activity in the UN.

Electing BHO will insure the destruction of many innocent children. Obama supporters don't care.
Post #: 34
RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Chris... - 10/24/2008 12:17:19 AM   
ManimalX


Posts: 1271
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: relady

quote:

John McCain will appoint justices like Alito and Roberts, and Alito has already stated that Roe v. Wade should be revisited
Which, after 35 years and much supporting case law would be in and of itself "activist" rather than "constructionist." Repubs and prolifers are all for activist court decisions when it's something THEY support.


No, not activist at all. Roe v Wade was a horrible legal decision and bad law, as the majority of legal experts agree. Repealing a bad law isn't "activist".

_____________________________

"But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies will be burned up and dissolved, and the earth and the works that are done on it will be exposed." - 2nd Peter 3:10
Post #: 35
RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Chris... - 10/25/2008 5:04:20 PM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1049
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: P31W

quote:

abortion is a non-issue in this election anyway


Abortion may be a "non issue" for you in this election that however does not mean you are correct. If Obama wins he is going to strip states rights away. Meaning in our state parents will no longer be required to give concent for their 16 yr old daughter to have an abortion. Manditory counseling and the following 24 hour waiting period will be done away with. The medical requirement that our state has in place will be swept away.

Also taking into account that with an Obama administration public tax dollars will be used to promote and preform abortion is it going to be an issue all tax payers should be concerned about.


You cannot serve both God and Money.


Please provide links proving your assertions. And if you are speaking about S1173 (Freedom of Choice Act) - the only thing that is different between what this Act is providing and the current law, is that the mother's health is better represented as a condition on which abortions are legal.

Thank you in advance, Peace and God bless,
Post #: 36
RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Chris... - 10/25/2008 5:15:44 PM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1049
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SonInMe1

quote:

abortion is a non-issue


When murdering children is not an issue, our nation should be destroyed.

Why are christian values seperate from financial ability or success? Money ain't evil, ya know? Its what you do with it or how it controls you that CAN be evil.

I wonder...all these blacks voting for Obama becaus ehe is black...where were they when Alan Keyes ran? Keyes was said not to have any experience because he never won an election....but I would take what Alan wanted over Obama any day.


How is the issue of abortion going to be different under Obama?

McCain supported the appointments of Breyer, Souter, Kennedy and Ginsburg; McCain scores a 66% from the nrlc.org - there are over a dozen Democrats that score better than this. McCain is also co-leader of the Gang of 14 - an agreement between Democrats and Republicans to pick judges that are ok with both sides - in other words, centrist judges. On top of this, the Democrats control the Senate, who approves the SCJ appointments.

Republican presidents have appointed the majority of SCJs in the last 3 decades and STILL RVW has not been overturned - this includes appointing SCJ Kennedy - appointed by Reagan, highly lauded by conservatives back in the day - Kennedy had THE deciding vote to overturn RVW in 1992 in PP v Casey and did NOT. Not to mention the fact that Republicans controlled both the executive and legislative branches of government from 2000-2006 - a GOLDEN opportunity to pass anti-abortion legislation - but did they? Um, no.

And regarding Alito and Roberts. Roberts has called RVW the settled law of the land. And, the Democrats did not fillibuster either of these appointments - either they're not as conservative as you think, or, the Democrats should be given credit for their appointments as well.

Given the aforementioned, you're trying to tell me that under McCain it's going to be different on the issue of abortion, THE only stance of Republicans that I agree with? Please! As John Stossel would say: "Give me a break!"

Peace and God bless,
Post #: 37
RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Chris... - 10/25/2008 5:18:04 PM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1049
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rockwall

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lizahana

IMHO, since McCain (who, btw, voted in support of the appointments of Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer) is co-leader of the Gang of 14, and the Senate is controlled by Democrats, and will likely gain more seats, abortion is a non-issue in this election anyway. So, IMHO, then because of the aforementioned (which I'm sure people will include if they want to answer me), yes, this time, the economy trumps the abortion issue, since it is a non-issue.

Peace and God bless,


Is it a non-issue to you Lizahana because we will have Democrat controlled Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches of government that will not let Roe v. Wade be overturned?

Not sure if you read this post (it's too long to repeat) but South Dakota has a bill on the books that will directly challenge Roe v. Wade: Abortion law LINK

John McCain will appoint justices like Alito and Roberts, and Alito has already stated that Roe v. Wade should be revisited. Barack said that he opposed them.


Since 3-4 people responded to me, and I don't want to write over and over again, I'm going to paste (this irritates some on hear - sorry if it does you, but I don't have time to sit and type all day):

How is the issue of abortion going to be different under Obama?

McCain supported the appointments of Breyer, Souter, Kennedy and Ginsburg; McCain scores a 66% from the nrlc.org - there are over a dozen Democrats that score better than this. McCain is also co-leader of the Gang of 14 - an agreement between Democrats and Republicans to pick judges that are ok with both sides - in other words, centrist judges. On top of this, the Democrats control the Senate, who approves the SCJ appointments.

Republican presidents have appointed the majority of SCJs in the last 3 decades and STILL RVW has not been overturned - this includes appointing SCJ Kennedy - appointed by Reagan, highly lauded by conservatives back in the day - Kennedy had THE deciding vote to overturn RVW in 1992 in PP v Casey and did NOT. Not to mention the fact that Republicans controlled both the executive and legislative branches of government from 2000-2006 - a GOLDEN opportunity to pass anti-abortion legislation - but did they? Um, no.

And regarding Alito and Roberts. Roberts has called RVW the settled law of the land. And, the Democrats did not fillibuster either of these appointments - either they're not as conservative as you think, or, the Democrats should be given credit for their appointments as well.

Given the aforementioned, you're trying to tell me that under McCain it's going to be different on the issue of abortion, THE only stance of Republicans that I agree with? Please! As John Stossel would say: "Give me a break!"

Peace and God bless,
Post #: 38
RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Chris... - 10/25/2008 5:26:04 PM   
Lizahana

 

Posts: 1049
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ljmac

quote:

ORIGINAL: P31W

quote:

abortion is a non-issue in this election anyway


Abortion may be a "non issue" for you in this election that however does not mean you are correct. If Obama wins he is going to strip states rights away. Meaning in our state parents will no longer be required to give concent for their 16 yr old daughter to have an abortion. Manditory counseling and the following 24 hour waiting period will be done away with. The medical requirement that our state has in place will be swept away.

Also taking into account that with an Obama administration public tax dollars will be used to promote and preform abortion is it going to be an issue all tax payers should be concerned about.


You cannot serve both God and Money.


Liz has her stories and they never change, good economy, bad economy, she'll always find an excuse to support those who make it easy to kill children.

She spreads this nonsense that electing Obama will be no different than McCain concerning abortion. The truth is that electing BHO will be a death sentence for many children.

Obama has said that he will fight the Hyde amendment. The Hyde (R-IL) amendment prevents the fed gov. from paying for abortions. Liberal Nat Hentoff has estimated that it has saved one million lives.

Obama has also said that he will send money to foreign agencies that abort children. If you're a brown or black baby your chances of survival are in peril.

These are not all. He has other plans to insure the destruction of innocent lives, such as signing the Freedom of Choice Act and promoting pro-abortion activity in the UN.

Electing BHO will insure the destruction of many innocent children. Obama supporters don't care.


The only thing different between the current laws and S1173 (Freedom of Choice Act), is that S1173 ensures there are more clauses for the mothers health and you know it.

And ljmac chooses to ignore the fact that the Republicans are definitely flawed themselves, when it comes to overturning RVW - most notably, John McCain.

Again, I'm just going to repost facts, ljmac:

How is the issue of abortion going to be different under Obama?

McCain supported the appointments of Breyer, Souter, Kennedy and Ginsburg; McCain scores a 66% from the nrlc.org - there are over a dozen Democrats that score better than this. McCain is also co-leader of the Gang of 14 - an agreement between Democrats and Republicans to pick judges that are ok with both sides - in other words, centrist judges. On top of this, the Democrats control the Senate, who approves the SCJ appointments.

Republican presidents have appointed the majority of SCJs in the last 3 decades and STILL RVW has not been overturned - this includes appointing SCJ Kennedy - appointed by Reagan, highly lauded by conservatives back in the day - Kennedy had THE deciding vote to overturn RVW in 1992 in PP v Casey and did NOT. Not to mention the fact that Republicans controlled both the executive and legislative branches of government from 2000-2006 - a GOLDEN opportunity to pass anti-abortion legislation - but did they? Um, no.

And regarding Alito and Roberts. Roberts has called RVW the settled law of the land. And, the Democrats did not fillibuster either of these appointments - either they're not as conservative as you think, or, the Democrats should be given credit for their appointments as well.

Given the aforementioned, you're trying to tell me that under McCain it's going to be different on the issue of abortion, THE only stance of Republicans that I agree with? Please! As John Stossel would say: "Give me a break!"

Peace and God bless,
Post #: 39
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> RE: Is the ecomony really more important than our Christian values?
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Preaching.com Forums on Faith Community Network
  Forum Tools
Ministry Leaders Folder

Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 


Faith Community Network is a proud member of the Salem Web Network of sites including:

CCMmagazine.com | ChristianJobs.com | ChurchStaffing.com | Crosscards.com | CrossDaily.com | Crosswalk.com | LightSource.com | OnePlace.com | SermonSearch.com | TheFish.com | XulonPress.com | YouthWorkerJournal.com
Enjoy the websites of these Faith Community Network Sponsors:

ChristianBook.com | EHarmony.com | Gospel for Asia | LifewayStores.com | Campus Crusade for Christ | Trinity College and Seminary | Townhall.com | Moody Distance Learning Center | Billygraham.org

© Copyright 2006, FaithCommunityNetwork.com. All rights reserved.
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI